March 12, 2009 · 11:33 pm
I’ve long had reservations about Berkeley High and the way its small schools function to divide students academically, which unintentionally tends to lead to further divisions along social and racial lines. Earlier today I was talking to another teacher about how I’m working to address the achievement gap in my classroom, and happened to bring up my criticisms of Berkeley High. After our talk I ran out to grab a coffee and what was the first thing I saw on the table at the coffee shop? This week’s East Bay Express with the glaring headline on the cover:
Separate and Unequal at Berkeley’s Small Schools
Berkeley High embraced the small schools movement to close its staggering racial achievement gap. But evidence suggests that these schools are exacerbating the very problem they were supposed to solve.
Click here to read the full text of the article.
At first I was excited to read the article–finally an indictment of the segregation at Berkeley High! But, like so many in Berkeley, and I’m afraid so many powerful white teachers and parents, author Rachel Swan got the story all wrong.
Swan’s initial skepticism of the small schools movement is not unfounded. Small schools, like their larger counterparts, are not without fallible teachers and administrators, or moments of pedagogy that miss the mark. But Swan appears to view the issue similarly to the teachers at BHS who rail against the small schools.
I’ve selected some of Swan’s own reporting to articulate what I see at Berkeley High, as a teacher, scholar, observer of BHS classrooms, opposer of segregation, holder of almost unattainably high expectations of all students, local resident, relative of a BHS student, and friend of many BHS alumni.
Continue reading →
Filed under Uncategorized
Tagged as academic language, achievement gap, angry, BayCES, Berkeley High School, bias, Bloom's taxonomy, California High School Exit Exam, classism, culturally biased tests, curriculum, David Tyack, dilemma, East Bay Express, education, educational philosophy, educational privilege, Educational theory, Experience and Education, explicit instruction, Herbert Kohl, Jean Anyon, John Dewey, journalism, language for academic purposes, Larry Cuban, Lisa Delpit, pedagogy, Pedro Noguera, politics, race, Rachel Swan, racially biased tests, racism, ranting, schools, segregation, Separate but Unequal, small schools, Social Class and School Knowledge, standardized tests, Susannah Bell, The Berkeley High Jacket, Tinkering Towards Utopia
March 5, 2009 · 4:49 am
The speech went over pretty well. None of my students seemed overly enthused about taking home a copy of the Anyon piece, but who can blame them? High school is hard and they have enough homework as it is. But the results were evident in today’s class, which was probably one of the best we’ve had together. For their exit task, I asked each student to write down one thing she or he did well as a student on the front of an index card, and then write down one thing one thing I did well as a teacher on the back. Here are some responses:
What students did well:
Today I supported my group members.
I focused on all my work.
I was supportive and cooperative.
I gave effort.
I participated a lot.
I focused and I tried my best.
I listened carefully.
What I did well in the students’ words [it’s important to recognize small victories, especially as a public school teacher]:
You were understanding.
You carefully listened to everyone.
As a teacher, it’s good that you push us.
You made a passionate argument.
You did a good job talking to us instead of just yelling like other teachers would have.
You connected to us. Empathized in a way.
And in conclusion…an entirely different take on the stuff and substance of high school.
Filed under Uncategorized
Tagged as academics, class, cooperation, education, educational privilege, effort, empathy, equity, focus, group work, Jean Anyon, listening, making an argument, passion, social class, Social Class and School Knowledge, speech, support, teaching, understanding
March 4, 2009 · 3:42 am
I’ve read this article about three times now. The Marxist ideal of transformation doesn’t obsess me as much as my conclusion that the differences in “school knowledge” that Anyon describes, as dictated by social class, are true, and have become more deeply entrenched each year since she wrote this piece (in 1981).
Tomorrow my students get an earful. They have the (un?)fortunate fate of a teacher insistent on being honest with them about the state of the world and one who refuses to let them get away with any less thinking than the “Executive Elite Class” does, regardless of their situation of birth. I can’t dictate the outcome of students’ lives, but I can insist on providing them with options.
Click here to read Jean Anyon’s “Social Class and School Knowledge.”
Filed under Uncategorized
Tagged as academica, capitalism, economics, education, Educational theory, Executive Elite Class, Jean Anyon, Light Reading, Marxism, politics, reading, required reading, social class, Social Class and School Knowledge, social justice, teaching